
Adamu Mu’azu
The Peoples
Democratic Party (PDP),its National Chairman, Adamu Mu’azu and others
have denied claims by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Olisa
Metuh, that the Ebenezer Alabi-led Executive Committee in Ondo State was
dissolved.
The PDP, Mu’azu and others, who are
defendants in a suit by members of the Alabi-led committee, denied
dissolving the Ondo Executive Committee.
They said the party’s national
leadership never stopped recognising and relating with the Alabi
committee as the party’s only executive in Ondo State.
Their position was contained in a
written address and a counter-affidavit, dated November 3, filed in
response to the case before Justice Sylvanus Oriji of the High Court of
the Federal Capital Territory in Apo, Abuja.
Metuh had, in a statement on October 26,
announced the dissolution of the Alabi-led executive committee and the
constitution of a caretaker committee headed by Dare Adeleke.
Also joined in the suit are the Deputy
National Chairman, Prince Uche Secondus, National Secretary Prof. Wale
Oladipo, Metuh, Senate President David Mark and the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC).
The plaintiffs include Alabi, Ondo PDP
Deputy Chairman Fatai Adams, and its Secretary, Oyedele Ibine and three
party chairmen at the local government level.
The defendants, who have also opposed
the plaintiff’s application for “an order of mandatory injunction
setting aside the purported dissolution” of the party exco in Ondo
State, said, in a supporting affidavit, that the claims by the
plaintiffs in their application dated October 27 were false and
misleading.
The defendants, in their written address
by their lawyer, Victory Kwon, added that “on the contrary and
significantly, the first – 13th defendants (PDP national leadership)
have continued to deal with only the plaintiffs/applicants (Ebenezer
Alabi-led exco) as regards to its activities in Ondo State.
The defendants also stated, in their
counter-affidavit deposed to by Nanchang Ndam, that “on the contrary,
the first – 13th defendants have only dealt with the
plaintiffs/applicants to the exclusion of any other person as regards
its activities in Ondo State.”
Alabi and others had, in their
application, accused the defendants of having engaged in “serial acts
aimed at appropriating to themselves or destroying the subject matter of
the suit”.
They urged the court to grant its
application for mandatory injunction “declaring null and void and of no
effect all steps, acts or things done by the caretaker committee pending
the determination of the suit.”
The court will conduct hearing on the applications filed by both parties today.
No comments:
Post a Comment